106 LAUREL VALLEY RD 2 TX 78746
| Owner | CHRISTIANSON JAMES |
|---|---|
| Parcel ID | 0115130109 |
| Short ID | 114884 |
| Type | Real |
| Use Code | C1 Vacant Lot |
| Valuation | Cost |
| Improvement SF | — |
| Land SF | 29,272 SF |
| Acres | 0.672 |
| Year Built | — |
| Legal | LOT A *(.672 AC) DEGRESS CONFIRMING PLAT |
| Neighborhood | M5700 |
| Land | $792,566 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Land Market | Not Available |
| Total Land | $792,566 |
| Improvement | — |
|---|---|
| Total Improvement | — |
| Market | $792,566 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Exclusion (−) | Not Available |
| Appraised | $792,566 |
| Value Limitation Adjustment (−) (homestead cap) | −$19,886 |
| Net Appraised (assessed) | $772,680 |
| Taxable Value | $772,680 |
|---|
Appreciation: Market value has risen +77.9% from $445,500 (2021) to $792,566 (2025), a CAGR of 15.5% over 4 years. This is strong appreciation — well above typical inflation. Most of this growth came in a single year (2021→2025), not a steady climb — worth checking what drove that reappraisal rather than assuming a smooth trend. Over the same span, the median Land/Vacant parcel countywide rose +487.2%, so this parcel has lagged the broader land/vacant market over the same period.
Tax Burden: The combined rate across 6 taxing entities is 1.6379% in 2025 (-0.0111% vs 2024 — rates decreased ). At the current taxable value, estimated annual taxes are $12,655. Eanes ISD is the largest single contributor, at 50.8% of the total 2025 levy.
Assessment Gap: Assessed value ($772,680) is $19,886 below market value, suggesting potential for an upward assessment in future years.
Asset Class: Land / Vacant. This is valued using the cost approach, tied more to replacement cost and physical condition than to income performance.
Value Composition: Land carries 100% of market value ($792,566 land vs $0 improvements), about $27/SF of land. With value concentrated in the land, this reads as a land-dominated asset — the classic higher-and-best-use / redevelopment signal. Underwrite the dirt, not the building.
Submarket Position: At $792,566, this parcel sits in the top quartile (≥75th percentile) of Land/Vacant property in Travis County — county median $85,028 (P25 $24,862 / P75 $363,420, n=35,611). Land/Vacant here is the broad TCAD category — every land/vacant property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. See the Peer Set and the Where This Property Stands benchmark below, which narrows to this property's actual use code, for parcel-level comparables.
Forward Outlook: Holding the +15.5% Base-scenario CAGR (Based on 2021–2025 certified trend, projected forward from 2025), the model projects market value near $1,628,434 by 2030, with an estimated annual tax burden around $24,051. Estimated Forward figures are model projections, not certified — see the 6-Year Projection section for the low/base/high bands.
No delinquent taxes on record.
No large value jumps, delinquencies, or data anomalies found for this parcel.
| Entity | 2021 Rate | 2022 Rate | 2023 Rate | 2024 Rate | 2025 Rate | YoY (2024→25) | Amt Due | Amt Paid | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEA Eanes ISD | 1.0608% | 1.0046% | 0.8880% | 0.8855% | 0.8322% | -0.0533% | $6,430.24 | $6,430.24 | Paid |
| TCO Travis County | 0.3574% | 0.3182% | 0.3047% | 0.3444% | 0.3758% | +0.0314% | $2,904.08 | $2,904.08 | Paid |
| CWH City of West Lake Hills | 0.0786% | 0.1504% | 0.1786% | 0.1786% | 0.1768% | -0.0018% | $1,365.97 | $1,365.97 | Paid |
| THD Travis Central Health | 0.1118% | 0.0987% | 0.1007% | 0.1080% | 0.1180% | +0.0101% | $911.94 | $911.94 | Paid |
| E09 Travis County ESD # 09 | 0.0807% | 0.0726% | 0.0735% | 0.0710% | 0.0758% | +0.0048% | $585.69 | $585.69 | Paid |
| W10 WCID # 10 | 0.0773% | 0.0675% | 0.0634% | 0.0614% | 0.0592% | -0.0022% | $457.43 | $457.43 | Paid |
| Combined Rate | 1.7666% | 1.7120% | 1.6088% | 1.6489% | 1.6379% | -0.0111% | $12,655.35 | $12,655.35 | Paid |
| 2026 Certified Certified | 2025 Certified Certified | Change 2025→2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | $758,451 | $792,566 | -4.3% |
| Assessed Value | $758,451 | $772,680 | -1.8% |
| Land Value | $758,451 | $792,566 | -4.3% |
| Improvement Value | — | — | — |
| Taxable Value | $758,451 | $772,680 | -1.8% |
| Total Tax 2026 = estimate |
~$12,422
Estimated
|
~$12,655
Partial
|
ⓘ |
| 2026 Preliminary Preliminary | 2026 Certified Certified | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | $758,451 | $758,451 | +0 (+0.0%) |
| Taxable Value | $758,451 | $758,451 | +0 (+0.0%) |
| Year | Market Value | Land Value | Imprv Value | Value Limitation Adj (−) | Net Appraised (Assessed) | Taxable Value | Total Tax | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $758,451 | $758,451 | — | — | $758,451 | $758,451 | Not yet — post-cert | Certified — no billing yet |
| 2025 | $792,566 | $792,566 | — | −$19,886 | $772,680 | $772,680 | ~$12,655 | Partial |
| 2024 | $— | — | — | — | $792,000 | $— | not in county billing file ⓘ | Partial |
| 2023 | $— | — | — | — | $792,000 | $— | not in county billing file ⓘ | Partial |
| 2022 | $— | — | — | — | $702,528 | $— | not in county billing file ⓘ | Partial |
| 2021 | $445,500 | — | — | — | $445,500 | $— | not in county billing file ⓘ | Partial |
| Year | MktVal YoY | Assessed YoY | Asmt Ratio | Eff. Tax Rate | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.3% | -1.8% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2025 | +0.1% | -2.4% | 97.5% | Not available | Partial |
| 2024 | +0.0% | +0.0% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2023 | +12.7% | +12.7% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2022 | +57.7% | +57.7% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2021 | base year | — | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| Cumulative market value growth (earliest valid year → 2025): +77.9% | |||||
| 12 Month | Hist. Avg | Forecast Avg | Peak | When | Trough | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value Growth | -4.3% | +36.8% | +16.5% | +77.9% | 2025 | -4.3% | 2026 |
| Assessment Ratio | 100.0% | 99.2% | — | 100.0% | 2021 | 97.5% | 2025 |
| Effective Tax Rate (2025) | 1.6000% | 1.6000% | — | 1.6000% | 2025 | 1.6000% | 2025 |
|
Tax Amount
⚑ 2025 total is a derived or partial figure, not independently confirmed |
$12,655 | $12,655 | ~$19,096 | $12,655 | 2025 | $12,655 | 2025 |
| Year | ~Mkt Value | ~Assessed | ~Rate | ~Ann. Tax | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ~$915,340 | ~$915,340 | ~1.6057% | ~$14,697 | +15.5% |
| 2027 | ~$1,057,132 | ~$1,057,132 | ~1.5735% | ~$16,634 | +33.4% |
| 2028 | ~$1,220,889 | ~$1,220,889 | ~1.5413% | ~$18,818 | +54.0% |
| 2029 | ~$1,410,013 | ~$1,410,013 | ~1.5091% | ~$21,279 | +77.9% |
| 2030 | ~$1,628,434 | ~$1,628,434 | ~1.4769% | ~$24,051 | +105.5% |
| 2026 | ~$899,489 | ~$899,489 | ~1.6379% | ~$14,732 | +13.5% |
| 2027 | ~$1,020,836 | ~$1,020,836 | ~1.6379% | ~$16,720 | +28.8% |
| 2028 | ~$1,158,553 | ~$1,158,553 | ~1.6379% | ~$18,975 | +46.2% |
| 2029 | ~$1,314,850 | ~$1,314,850 | ~1.6379% | ~$21,535 | +65.9% |
| 2030 | ~$1,492,232 | ~$1,492,232 | ~1.6379% | ~$24,441 | +88.3% |
| 2026 | ~$931,191 | ~$931,191 | ~1.5896% | ~$14,802 | +17.5% |
| 2027 | ~$1,094,063 | ~$1,094,063 | ~1.5413% | ~$16,863 | +38.0% |
| 2028 | ~$1,285,422 | ~$1,285,422 | ~1.4930% | ~$19,192 | +62.2% |
| 2029 | ~$1,510,251 | ~$1,510,251 | ~1.4448% | ~$21,819 | +90.6% |
| 2030 | ~$1,774,404 | ~$1,774,404 | ~1.3965% | ~$24,779 | +123.9% |
In 2025, this property's market value of $792,566 places it in the top 25% for Land/Vacant properties in Travis County (35611 comparable) — 9× the county median of $85,028. Land/Vacant here is the broad TCAD category — every land/vacant property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. Use the Use Code filter above to narrow to this property's actual type.
| Year | This Property | Bottom 25% | Median | Top 25% | Position | Group YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $792,566 | $24,862 | $85,028 | $363,420 | ↑ Top 25% | +2.1% |
| 2024 | — | $23,000 | $66,000 | $330,000 | — | +0.0% |
| 2023 | — | $25,000 | $71,500 | $271,439 | — | +0.0% |
| 2022 | — | $15,000 | $55,000 | $180,463 | — | +100.0% |
| 2021 | $445,500 | $6,000 | $14,480 | $80,000 | ↑ Top 25% | base yr |
Estimate only. The appraisal district sets value as of Jan 1 (not at sale price). A sale is strong evidence of market value and is typically reflected in the next Jan 1 valuation. Taxing units set rates annually. Modeled from government data — not a legal or tax opinion.