901 HIGHLAND BLVD 3 TX
| Owner | HSD COMMERCIAL LLP |
|---|---|
| Parcel ID | 0135861605 |
| Short ID | 914227 |
| Type | Real |
| Use Code | 26 Large Office Condo |
| Valuation | Income |
| Improvement SF | — |
| Land SF | 92,208 SF |
| Acres | 2.117 |
| Year Built | — |
| Legal | UNT COMMERCIAL 3 HIGHLAND VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM PLUS 16.0 % INT IN COM AREA |
| Neighborhood | 1SW2 |
| Land | $387,273 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Land Market | Not Available |
| Total Land | $387,273 |
| Improvement | — |
|---|---|
| Total Improvement | — |
| Market | $387,273 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Exclusion (−) | Not Available |
| Appraised | $387,273 |
| Value Limitation Adjustment (−) | — |
| Net Appraised (assessed) | $387,273 |
| Taxable Value | $387,273 |
|---|
Appreciation: Market value has risen +320.0% from $92,200 (2021) to $387,273 (2025), a CAGR of 43.2% over 4 years. This is strong appreciation — well above typical inflation. Most of this growth came in a single year (2025→2026), not a steady climb — worth checking what drove that reappraisal rather than assuming a smooth trend. Over the same span, the median Land/Vacant parcel countywide rose +487.2%, so this parcel has lagged the broader land/vacant market over the same period.
Tax Burden: The combined rate across 6 taxing entities is 2.0961% in 2025 (+0.0182% vs 2024 — rates increased ). At the current taxable value, estimated annual taxes are $8,118. Lake Travis ISD is the largest single contributor, at 49.6% of the total 2025 levy.
Asset Class: Land / Vacant. This is valued using the income approach, so changes in rent roll or occupancy move the appraisal more directly than they would for a cost-approach property.
Value Composition: Land carries 100% of market value ($387,273 land vs $0 improvements), about $4/SF of land. With value concentrated in the land, this reads as a land-dominated asset — the classic higher-and-best-use / redevelopment signal. Underwrite the dirt, not the building.
Submarket Position: At $387,273, this parcel sits in the top quartile (≥75th percentile) of Land/Vacant property in Travis County — county median $85,028 (P25 $24,862 / P75 $363,420, n=35,611). Land/Vacant here is the broad TCAD category — every land/vacant property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. See the Peer Set and the Where This Property Stands benchmark below, which narrows to this property's actual use code, for parcel-level comparables.
Forward Outlook: Holding the +43.2% Base-scenario CAGR (Based on 2021–2025 certified trend, projected forward from 2025), the model projects market value near $2,328,762 by 2030, with an estimated annual tax burden around $40,192. Estimated Forward figures are model projections, not certified — see the 6-Year Projection section for the low/base/high bands.
No delinquent taxes on record.
Market value changed by 320% in 2022, flagged as unusually large. Verify against comparable sales before using this value in underwriting.
| Entity | 2021 Rate | 2022 Rate | 2023 Rate | 2024 Rate | 2025 Rate | YoY (2024→25) | Amt Due | Amt Paid | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILT Lake Travis ISD | 1.2301% | 1.2121% | 1.0741% | 1.0656% | 1.0397% | -0.0259% | $4,026.48 | $4,026.48 | Paid |
| TCO Travis County | 0.3574% | 0.3182% | 0.3047% | 0.3444% | 0.3758% | +0.0314% | $1,455.55 | $1,455.55 | Paid |
| U4J Travis County MUD # 11 | 0.4385% | 0.3645% | 0.3233% | 0.3125% | 0.3025% | -0.0100% | $1,171.50 | $1,171.50 | Paid |
| CLW City of Lakeway | 0.1545% | 0.1290% | 0.1440% | 0.1598% | 0.1696% | +0.0098% | $656.97 | $656.97 | Paid |
| THD Travis Central Health | 0.1118% | 0.0987% | 0.1007% | 0.1080% | 0.1180% | +0.0101% | $457.07 | $457.07 | Paid |
| E06 Travis County ESD # 06 | 0.1000% | 0.0867% | 0.0831% | 0.0876% | 0.0904% | +0.0028% | $350.09 | $350.09 | Paid |
| Combined Rate | 2.3923% | 2.2092% | 2.0298% | 2.0779% | 2.0961% | +0.0182% | $8,117.66 | $8,117.66 | Paid |
| 2026 Certified Certified | 2025 Certified Certified | Change 2025→2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | $2,377,312 | $387,273 | +513.9% |
| Assessed Value | $464,728 | $387,273 | +20.0% |
| Land Value | $553,247 | $387,273 | +42.9% |
| Improvement Value | $1,824,065 | — | — |
| Taxable Value | $464,728 | $387,273 | +20.0% |
| HS Cap Loss | -$1,912,584 | — | |
| Total Tax 2026 = estimate |
~$9,741
Estimated
|
~$8,118
Partial
|
ⓘ |
| 2026 Preliminary Preliminary | 2026 Certified Certified | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | $2,377,312 | $2,377,312 | +0 (+0.0%) |
| Taxable Value | $464,728 | $464,728 | +0 (+0.0%) |
| Year | Market Value | Land Value | Imprv Value | Value Limitation Adj (−) | Net Appraised (Assessed) | Taxable Value | Total Tax | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $2,377,312 | $553,247 | $1,824,065 | −$1,912,584 | $464,728 | $464,728 | Not yet — post-cert | Certified — no billing yet |
| 2025 | $387,273 | $387,273 | — | — | $387,273 | $387,273 | ~$8,118 | Partial |
| 2024 | $— | — | — | — | $387,273 | $— | $8,047 | Verified |
| 2023 | $— | — | — | — | $387,273 | $— | $7,861 | Verified |
| 2022 | $— | — | — | — | $387,273 | $— | $8,556 | Verified |
| 2021 | $92,200 | — | — | — | $92,200 | $— | $2,206 | Verified |
| Year | MktVal YoY | Assessed YoY | Asmt Ratio | Eff. Tax Rate | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +513.9% ! | +20.0% | 19.6% | Not available | Partial |
| 2025 | +0.0% | +0.0% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2024 | +0.0% | +0.0% | ~100% | 2.0800% | Verified |
| 2023 | +0.0% | +0.0% | ~100% | 2.0300% | Verified |
| 2022 | +320.0% ! | +320.0% | ~100% | 2.2100% | Verified |
| 2021 | base year | — | ~100% | 2.3900% | Verified |
| Cumulative market value growth (earliest valid year → 2025): +320.0% | |||||
| 12 Month | Hist. Avg | Forecast Avg | Peak | When | Trough | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value Growth | +513.9% | +416.9% | +19.2% | +513.9% | 2026 | +320.0% | 2025 |
| Assessment Ratio | 19.5% | 73.2% | — | 100.0% | 2021 | 19.5% | 2026 |
| Effective Tax Rate (2025) | 2.1000% | 2.1000% | — | 2.1000% | 2025 | 2.1000% | 2025 |
|
Tax Amount
⚑ 2025 total is a derived or partial figure, not independently confirmed |
$8,118 | $5,162 | ~$23,487 | $8,118 | 2025 | $2,206 | 2021 |
| Year | ~Mkt Value | ~Assessed | ~Rate | ~Ann. Tax | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ~$554,420 | ~$554,420 | ~2.0221% | ~$11,211 | +43.2% |
| 2027 | ~$793,707 | ~$793,707 | ~1.9480% | ~$15,462 | +104.9% |
| 2028 | ~$1,136,271 | ~$1,136,271 | ~1.8740% | ~$21,293 | +193.4% |
| 2029 | ~$1,626,685 | ~$1,626,685 | ~1.7999% | ~$29,279 | +320.0% |
| 2030 | ~$2,328,762 | ~$2,328,762 | ~1.7259% | ~$40,192 | +501.3% |
| 2026 | ~$546,674 | ~$546,674 | ~2.0961% | ~$11,459 | +41.2% |
| 2027 | ~$771,685 | ~$771,685 | ~2.0961% | ~$16,175 | +99.3% |
| 2028 | ~$1,089,311 | ~$1,089,311 | ~2.0961% | ~$22,833 | +181.3% |
| 2029 | ~$1,537,671 | ~$1,537,671 | ~2.0961% | ~$32,231 | +297.1% |
| 2030 | ~$2,170,575 | ~$2,170,575 | ~2.0961% | ~$45,498 | +460.5% |
| 2026 | ~$562,165 | ~$562,165 | ~1.9850% | ~$11,159 | +45.2% |
| 2027 | ~$816,039 | ~$816,039 | ~1.8740% | ~$15,292 | +110.7% |
| 2028 | ~$1,184,562 | ~$1,184,562 | ~1.7629% | ~$20,883 | +205.9% |
| 2029 | ~$1,719,510 | ~$1,719,510 | ~1.6518% | ~$28,404 | +344.0% |
| 2030 | ~$2,496,039 | ~$2,496,039 | ~1.5408% | ~$38,459 | +544.5% |
In 2025, this property's market value of $387,273 places it in the top 25% for Land/Vacant properties in Travis County (35611 comparable) — 5× the county median of $85,028. Land/Vacant here is the broad TCAD category — every land/vacant property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. Use the Use Code filter above to narrow to this property's actual type.
| Year | This Property | Bottom 25% | Median | Top 25% | Position | Group YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $387,273 | $24,862 | $85,028 | $363,420 | ↑ Top 25% | +2.1% |
| 2024 | — | $23,000 | $66,000 | $330,000 | — | +0.0% |
| 2023 | — | $25,000 | $71,500 | $271,439 | — | +0.0% |
| 2022 | — | $15,000 | $55,000 | $180,463 | — | +100.0% |
| 2021 | $92,200 | $6,000 | $14,480 | $80,000 | ↑ Top 25% | base yr |
Estimate only. The appraisal district sets value as of Jan 1 (not at sale price). A sale is strong evidence of market value and is typically reflected in the next Jan 1 valuation. Taxing units set rates annually. Modeled from government data — not a legal or tax opinion.