12801 ANDERSON MILL RD TX
| Owner | AMNW OFFICE LP |
|---|---|
| Parcel ID | 0176280421 |
| Short ID | 725231 |
| Type | Real |
| Use Code | 53 Office Small (<10,000 SF) |
| Valuation | Income |
| Improvement SF | 14,400 SF |
| Land SF | 239,493 SF |
| Acres | 5.498 |
| Year Built | 2022 |
| Legal | LOT 1 ANDERSON MILL OFFICE PARK |
| Neighborhood | 1NW3 |
| Land | $718,479 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Land Market | Not Available |
| Total Land | $718,479 |
| Improvement | $3,927,236 |
|---|---|
| Total Improvement | $3,927,236 |
| Market | $4,645,715 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Exclusion (−) | Not Available |
| Appraised | $4,645,715 |
| Value Limitation Adjustment (−) (homestead cap) | −$811,194 |
| Net Appraised (assessed) | $3,834,521 |
| Taxable Value | $3,834,521 |
|---|
Appreciation: Market value has risen +546.6% from $718,479 (2021) to $4,645,715 (2025), a CAGR of 59.5% over 4 years. This is strong appreciation — well above typical inflation. Most of this growth came in a single year (2021→2024), not a steady climb — worth checking what drove that reappraisal rather than assuming a smooth trend. Over the same span, the median Agricultural parcel countywide rose +479.4%, so this parcel has outpaced the broader agricultural market over the same period.
Tax Burden: The combined rate across 5 taxing entities is 2.0442% in 2025 (+0.0406% vs 2024 — rates increased ). At the current taxable value, estimated annual taxes are $78,384. Leander ISD is the largest single contributor, at 53.2% of the total 2025 levy.
Assessment Gap: Assessed value ($3,834,521) is $811,194 below market value, suggesting potential for an upward assessment in future years.
Asset Class: Agricultural. Agricultural valuation may be subject to rollback taxes if land use changes. This is valued using the income approach, so changes in rent roll or occupancy move the appraisal more directly than they would for a cost-approach property.
Value Composition: Land carries 15% of market value ($718,479 land vs $3,927,236 improvements), about $3/SF of land. Most value sits in the improvements, so building condition, age (~4 yrs), and rent roll drive the underwriting.
Submarket Position: At $4,645,715, this parcel sits in the top quartile (≥75th percentile) of Agricultural property in Travis County — county median $597,708 (P25 $207,536 / P75 $1,442,275, n=7,602). Agricultural here is the broad TCAD category — every agricultural property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. See the Peer Set and the Where This Property Stands benchmark below, which narrows to this property's actual use code, for parcel-level comparables.
Forward Outlook: Holding the +29.5% Base-scenario CAGR (Based on 2022–2025 certified trend, projected forward from 2025), the model projects market value near $16,921,874 by 2030, with an estimated annual tax burden around $103,172. Estimated Forward figures are model projections, not certified — see the 6-Year Projection section for the low/base/high bands.
No delinquent taxes on record.
3 components · show ▾hide ▴
| Code | Description | SF | In Gross |
|---|---|---|---|
| 551 | PAVED AREA | 54,450 SF | ✗ |
| 1ST | 1st Floor | 14,400 SF | ✓ |
| 501 | CANOPY | 792 SF | ✗ |
Market value changed by 399% in 2023, flagged as unusually large. Verify against comparable sales before using this value in underwriting.
| Entity | 2021 Rate | 2022 Rate | 2023 Rate | 2024 Rate | 2025 Rate | YoY (2024→25) | Amt Due | Amt Paid | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILE Leander ISD | 1.3370% | 1.2746% | 1.1087% | 1.0869% | 1.0869% | +0.0000% | $41,677.41 | $41,677.41 | Paid |
| TCO Travis County | 0.3574% | 0.3182% | 0.3047% | 0.3444% | 0.3758% | +0.0314% | $14,411.86 | $14,411.86 | Paid |
| CCP City of Cedar Park | 0.4320% | 0.3900% | 0.3700% | 0.3630% | 0.3600% | -0.0030% | $13,804.28 | $13,804.28 | Paid |
| THD Travis Central Health | 0.1118% | 0.0987% | 0.1007% | 0.1080% | 0.1180% | +0.0101% | $4,525.62 | $4,525.62 | Paid |
| ACT Austin Community College | 0.1048% | 0.0987% | 0.0986% | 0.1013% | 0.1034% | +0.0021% | $3,964.89 | $3,964.89 | Paid |
| Combined Rate | 2.3430% | 2.1802% | 1.9826% | 2.0036% | 2.0442% | +0.0406% | $78,384.06 | $78,384.06 | Paid |
| 2026 Preliminary | 2025 Certified Certified | Change 2025→2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | — | $4,645,715 | — |
| Assessed Value | — | $3,834,521 | — |
| Land Value | — | $718,479 | — |
| Improvement Value | — | $3,927,236 | — |
| Taxable Value | — | $3,834,521 | — |
| Total Tax | Pending certification |
~$78,384
Partial
|
|
| Year | Market Value | Land Value | Imprv Value | Value Limitation Adj (−) | Net Appraised (Assessed) | Taxable Value | Total Tax | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4,645,715 | $718,479 | $3,927,236 | −$811,194 | $3,834,521 | $3,834,521 | ~$78,384 | Partial |
| 2024 | $3,587,347 | — | — | −$2,868,868 | $718,479 | $— | $64,024 | Verified |
| 2023 | $— | — | — | — | $718,479 | $— | $71,124 | Verified |
| 2022 | $— | — | — | — | $718,479 | $— | $15,664 | Verified |
| 2021 | $718,479 | — | — | — | $718,479 | $— | $16,834 | Verified |
| Year | MktVal YoY | Assessed YoY | Asmt Ratio | Eff. Tax Rate | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +45.4% | +20.0% | 82.5% | Not available | Partial |
| 2024 | -10.9% | -10.9% | ~100% | 2.0000% | Verified |
| 2023 | +399.3% ! | +399.3% | ~100% | 1.9800% | Verified |
| 2022 | +0.0% | +0.0% | ~100% | 2.1800% | Verified |
| 2021 | base year | — | ~100% | 2.3400% | Verified |
| Cumulative market value growth (earliest valid year → 2025): +546.6% | |||||
| 12 Month | Hist. Avg | Forecast Avg | Peak | When | Trough | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value Growth | +29.5% | +214.4% | +29.5% | +399.3% | 2024 | +29.5% | 2025 |
| Assessment Ratio | 82.5% | 67.5% | — | 100.0% | 2021 | 20.0% | 2024 |
| Effective Tax Rate (2025) | 1.6900% | 1.6900% | — | 1.6900% | 2025 | 1.6900% | 2025 |
|
Tax Amount
⚑ 2025 total is a derived or partial figure, not independently confirmed |
$78,384 | $53,081 | ~$93,007 | $78,384 | 2025 | $16,834 | 2021 |
| Year | ~Mkt Value | ~Assessed | ~Rate | ~Ann. Tax | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ~$6,016,331 | ~$4,217,973 | ~1.9695% | ~$83,072 | +29.5% |
| 2027 | ~$7,791,318 | ~$4,639,770 | ~1.8948% | ~$87,913 | +67.7% |
| 2028 | ~$10,089,975 | ~$5,103,747 | ~1.8201% | ~$92,891 | +117.2% |
| 2029 | ~$13,066,801 | ~$5,614,122 | ~1.7454% | ~$97,986 | +181.3% |
| 2030 | ~$16,921,874 | ~$6,175,534 | ~1.6707% | ~$103,172 | +264.2% |
| 2026 | ~$5,923,417 | ~$4,217,973 | ~2.0442% | ~$86,222 | +27.5% |
| 2027 | ~$7,552,523 | ~$4,639,770 | ~2.0442% | ~$94,845 | +62.6% |
| 2028 | ~$9,629,678 | ~$5,103,747 | ~2.0442% | ~$104,329 | +107.3% |
| 2029 | ~$12,278,110 | ~$5,614,122 | ~2.0442% | ~$114,762 | +164.3% |
| 2030 | ~$15,654,935 | ~$6,175,534 | ~2.0442% | ~$126,238 | +237.0% |
| 2026 | ~$6,109,246 | ~$4,217,973 | ~1.9321% | ~$81,496 | +31.5% |
| 2027 | ~$8,033,829 | ~$4,639,770 | ~1.8201% | ~$84,447 | +72.9% |
| 2028 | ~$10,564,711 | ~$5,103,747 | ~1.7080% | ~$87,172 | +127.4% |
| 2029 | ~$13,892,891 | ~$5,614,122 | ~1.5960% | ~$89,599 | +199.0% |
| 2030 | ~$18,269,542 | ~$6,175,534 | ~1.4839% | ~$91,639 | +293.3% |
In 2025, this property's market value of $4,645,715 places it in the top 25% for Agricultural properties in Travis County (7602 comparable) — 8× the county median of $597,708. Agricultural here is the broad TCAD category — every agricultural property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. Use the Use Code filter above to narrow to this property's actual type.
| Year | This Property | Bottom 25% | Median | Top 25% | Position | Group YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4,645,715 | $207,536 | $597,708 | $1,442,275 | ↑ Top 25% | +0.0% |
| 2024 | $3,587,347 | $217,016 | $597,296 | $1,446,593 | ↑ Top 25% | +23.7% |
| 2023 | — | $167,963 | $453,916 | $1,078,522 | — | +0.0% |
| 2022 | — | $180,794 | $446,888 | $1,009,883 | — | +46.1% |
| 2021 | $718,479 | $33,611 | $103,166 | $247,000 | ↑ Top 25% | base yr |
Estimate only. The appraisal district sets value as of Jan 1 (not at sale price). A sale is strong evidence of market value and is typically reflected in the next Jan 1 valuation. Taxing units set rates annually. Modeled from government data — not a legal or tax opinion.