17820 ALTESINO CV 78660
| Owner | THOMPSON PAUL & JOY EVELYN ANDERSON |
|---|---|
| Parcel ID | 0276671402 |
| Short ID | 957777 |
| Type | Real |
| Use Code | 01 Single-Family Residence |
| Valuation | Cost |
| Improvement SF | 1,666 SF |
| Land SF | 8,460 SF |
| Acres | 0.194 |
| Year Built | 2022 |
| Legal | VINE CREEK PHS 7 BLK L LOT 49 |
| Neighborhood | A9740 |
| Land | $41,943 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Land Market | Not Available |
| Total Land | $41,943 |
| Improvement | $283,855 |
|---|---|
| Total Improvement | $283,855 |
| Market | $325,798 |
|---|---|
| Special Use Exclusion (−) | Not Available |
| Appraised | $325,798 |
| Value Limitation Adjustment (−) | — |
| Net Appraised (assessed) | $325,798 |
| Taxable Value | $325,798 |
|---|
Appreciation: Market value has fallen -29.1% from $459,648 (2024) to $325,798 (2025), a CAGR of -29.1% over 1 year. Growth has been relatively flat for this asset class. Most of this growth came in a single year (2024→2025), not a steady climb — worth checking what drove that reappraisal rather than assuming a smooth trend. Over the same span, the median Land/Vacant parcel countywide rose +28.8%, so this parcel has lagged the broader land/vacant market over the same period.
Tax Burden: The combined rate across 5 taxing entities is 2.2285% in 2025 (+0.0325% vs 2024 — rates increased ). At the current taxable value, estimated annual taxes are $7,261. Pflugerville ISD is the largest single contributor, at 49.7% of the total 2025 levy.
Asset Class: Land / Vacant. This is valued using the cost approach, tied more to replacement cost and physical condition than to income performance.
Value Composition: Land carries 13% of market value ($41,943 land vs $283,855 improvements), about $5/SF of land. Most value sits in the improvements, so building condition, age (~4 yrs), and rent roll drive the underwriting.
Submarket Position: At $325,798, this parcel sits in the upper-middle (50th–75th percentile) of Land/Vacant property in Travis County — county median $85,028 (P25 $24,862 / P75 $363,420, n=35,611). Land/Vacant here is the broad TCAD category — every land/vacant property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. See the Peer Set and the Where This Property Stands benchmark below, which narrows to this property's actual use code, for parcel-level comparables.
Forward Outlook: Holding the -29.1% Base-scenario CAGR (Based on 2021–2025 certified trend, projected forward from 2025), the model projects market value near $58,286 by 2030, with an estimated annual tax burden around $1,150. Estimated Forward figures are model projections, not certified — see the 6-Year Projection section for the low/base/high bands.
No delinquent taxes on record.
6 components · show ▾hide ▴
| Code | Description | SF | In Gross |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1ST | 1st Floor | 1,666 SF | ✓ |
| 095 | HVAC RESIDENTIAL | 1,666 SF | ✗ |
| 041 | GARAGE ATT 1ST F | 390 SF | ✓ |
| 011 | PORCH OPEN 1ST F | 161 SF | ✗ |
| 252 | BEDROOMS | 3 SF | ✓ |
| 251 | BATHROOM | 2 SF | ✓ |
Market value changed by 1432% in 2023, flagged as unusually large. Verify against comparable sales before using this value in underwriting.
| Entity | 2021 Rate | 2022 Rate | 2023 Rate | 2024 Rate | 2025 Rate | YoY (2024→25) | Amt Due | Amt Paid | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPF Pflugerville ISD | 1.3880% | 1.2646% | 1.1092% | 1.1069% | 1.1069% | +0.0000% | $3,606.26 | $3,606.26 | Paid |
| CPF City of Pflugerville | 0.4863% | 0.4813% | 0.5362% | 0.5428% | 0.5350% | -0.0078% | $1,743.02 | $1,743.02 | Paid |
| TCO Travis County | 0.3574% | 0.3182% | 0.3047% | 0.3444% | 0.3758% | +0.0314% | $1,224.50 | $1,224.50 | Paid |
| THD Travis Central Health | 0.1118% | 0.0987% | 0.1007% | 0.1080% | 0.1180% | +0.0101% | $384.52 | $384.52 | Paid |
| E02 Travis County ESD # 02 | 0.0900% | 0.0800% | 0.0773% | 0.0939% | 0.0928% | -0.0011% | $302.23 | $302.23 | Paid |
| Combined Rate | 2.4335% | 2.2428% | 2.1280% | 2.1960% | 2.2285% | +0.0325% | $7,260.53 | $7,260.53 | Paid |
| 2026 Certified Certified | 2025 Certified Certified | Change 2025→2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | $324,930 | $325,798 | -0.3% |
| Assessed Value | $324,930 | $325,798 | -0.3% |
| Land Value | $103,840 | $41,943 | +147.6% |
| Improvement Value | $221,090 | $283,855 | -22.1% |
| Taxable Value | $324,930 | $325,798 | -0.3% |
| Total Tax 2026 = estimate |
~$7,241
Estimated
|
~$7,261
Partial
|
ⓘ |
| 2026 Preliminary Preliminary | 2026 Certified Certified | Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value | $361,797 | $324,930 | -36,867 (-10.2%) |
| Taxable Value | $361,797 | $324,930 | -36,867 (-10.2%) |
| Year | Market Value | Land Value | Imprv Value | Value Limitation Adj (−) | Net Appraised (Assessed) | Taxable Value | Total Tax | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $324,930 | $103,840 | $221,090 | — | $324,930 | $324,930 | Not yet — post-cert | Certified — no billing yet |
| 2025 | $325,798 | $41,943 | $283,855 | — | $325,798 | $325,798 | ~$7,261 | Partial |
| 2024 | $459,648 | — | — | −$419,648 | $40,000 | $— | $8,056 | Verified |
| 2023 | $— | — | — | — | $40,000 | $— | $9,782 | Verified |
| 2022 | $— | — | — | — | $30,000 | $— | $673 | Verified |
| Year | MktVal YoY | Assessed YoY | Asmt Ratio | Eff. Tax Rate | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.0% | +11.0% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2025 | -11.2% | -11.2% | ~100% | Not available | Partial |
| 2024 | -20.2% | -20.2% | ~100% | 2.2000% | Verified |
| 2023 | +1432.2% ! | +1432.2% | ~100% | 2.1300% | Verified |
| 2022 | base year | — | ~100% | 2.2400% | Verified |
| Cumulative market value growth (earliest valid year → 2025): +986.0% | |||||
| 12 Month | Hist. Avg | Forecast Avg | Peak | When | Trough | When | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Value Growth | -0.3% | -14.7% | -29.1% | -0.3% | 2026 | -29.1% | 2025 |
| Assessment Ratio | 100.0% | 69.6% | — | 100.0% | 2025 | 8.7% | 2024 |
| Effective Tax Rate (2025) | 2.2300% | 2.2300% | — | 2.2300% | 2025 | 2.2300% | 2025 |
|
Tax Amount
⚑ 2025 total is a derived or partial figure, not independently confirmed |
$7,261 | $7,658 | ~$2,746 | $8,056 | 2024 | $7,261 | 2025 |
| Year | ~Mkt Value | ~Assessed | ~Rate | ~Ann. Tax | Value Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ~$230,925 | ~$230,925 | ~2.1773% | ~$5,028 | -29.1% |
| 2027 | ~$163,680 | ~$163,680 | ~2.1261% | ~$3,480 | -49.8% |
| 2028 | ~$116,016 | ~$116,016 | ~2.0748% | ~$2,407 | -64.4% |
| 2029 | ~$82,232 | ~$82,232 | ~2.0236% | ~$1,664 | -74.8% |
| 2030 | ~$58,286 | ~$58,286 | ~1.9724% | ~$1,150 | -82.1% |
| 2026 | ~$309,508 | ~$309,508 | ~2.2285% | ~$6,897 | -5.0% |
| 2027 | ~$294,033 | ~$294,033 | ~2.2285% | ~$6,553 | -9.7% |
| 2028 | ~$279,331 | ~$279,331 | ~2.2285% | ~$6,225 | -14.3% |
| 2029 | ~$265,365 | ~$265,365 | ~2.2285% | ~$5,914 | -18.5% |
| 2030 | ~$252,096 | ~$252,096 | ~2.2285% | ~$5,618 | -22.6% |
| 2026 | ~$237,441 | ~$237,441 | ~2.1517% | ~$5,109 | -27.1% |
| 2027 | ~$173,047 | ~$173,047 | ~2.0748% | ~$3,590 | -46.9% |
| 2028 | ~$126,116 | ~$126,116 | ~1.9980% | ~$2,520 | -61.3% |
| 2029 | ~$91,913 | ~$91,913 | ~1.9211% | ~$1,766 | -71.8% |
| 2030 | ~$66,986 | ~$66,986 | ~1.8443% | ~$1,235 | -79.4% |
In 2025, this property's market value of $325,798 places it in the 50th–75th percentile for Land/Vacant properties in Travis County (35611 comparable) — 4× the county median of $85,028. Land/Vacant here is the broad TCAD category — every land/vacant property countywide, any size or use — not a use-code-specific peer group. Use the Use Code filter above to narrow to this property's actual type.
| Year | This Property | Bottom 25% | Median | Top 25% | Position | Group YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $325,798 | $24,862 | $85,028 | $363,420 | ↑ Above median | +2.1% |
| 2024 | $459,648 | $23,000 | $66,000 | $330,000 | ↑ Top 25% | +0.0% |
| 2023 | — | $25,000 | $71,500 | $271,439 | — | +0.0% |
| 2022 | — | $15,000 | $55,000 | $180,463 | — | +100.0% |
Estimate only. The appraisal district sets value as of Jan 1 (not at sale price). A sale is strong evidence of market value and is typically reflected in the next Jan 1 valuation. Taxing units set rates annually. Modeled from government data — not a legal or tax opinion.